As trustees continued to build on the IHBC’s 2017-18 Member Survey and its positive results – such as 92% of members satisfied or very satisfied with services, and 94% likely or very likely to recommend IHBC membership – in April IHBC they received a report that included itemised consideration of membership concerns, as reported in the extract below.
IHBC Chair James Caird said: ‘It is great to see such positive feedback overall from members of all categories, but we do also recognise the challenges faced.’
‘Critical to addressing those challenges is the informed analysis of – and response to – concerns raised by members across the survey.’
‘The extract below, taken from the April report to trustees from the IHBC’s National Office, shows just how seriously we take our members’ concerns.
‘With these thoughts at the front of our collective mind, we look forward to the next stage of our evolution that, in line with our corporate planning, will focus on governance and building the best from our experiences with ‘IHBC+’.’
IHBC Director Seán O’Reilly added: ‘The report presentation here has been adapted and simplified to be read effectively on our NewsBlog service, while Branch representatives can be contacted for further details.
‘The listing is included on the NewsBlogs as part of our formal feedback to respondents and to our membership as whole’.
‘And most especially, if you do recognise your concerns listed below, and think that we may not have addressed them adequately or responded effectively in light of our wider operations, please do feel free to contact me direct, most easily by email at director@ihbc.org.uk’.
NB: Note on NewsBlog formatting of report
- Comments are verbatim where possible, and numbered, with IHBC responses and updates indented and italicized.
- Most responses cross reference to the more general overarching report re-posted online
- New initiatives specifically addressing concerns listed are in bold.
In April 2018, the IHBC’s National Office reported to IHBC trustees and company directors as follows below:
- I sometimes feel I have to apologise for being a member of the IHBC and this is a great shame given that what it does is, taken as whole, greatly to be commended
- See A in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Disciplinary Process in place since 2010: http://ihbc.org.uk/resources/IHBC-AGM_2010.pdf
- Branch Officers guidance in place https://www.ihbc.org.uk/branches/branch_guide/index.html
- Additional guidance on Branch management with trustees 12 April 2018.
- The membership application process is still quite cumbersome
- See B in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Feedback to unsuccessful candidates still a ’sensitive’ issue but overseen by senior trustee.
- Now far too heavily focused on private sector members
- See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Code of Conduct and accreditation requirements (Testimonial and Areas of Competence) reflect public sector origins of standards:
- The organisation is only interested in local authority conservation…
- See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- HESPR services support private sector specifically, though open to public sector operations as well: https://www.ihbc.org.uk/hespr/
- CPD Recognised provider status open to private and public sector equally:
- Dedicated MATE sessions for private sector practices: e.g. https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=17035
- There is still too little done about getting all local authority conservation staff to become members
- See E in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, including
- Free membership support MATE sessions aimed at all members
- Local Planning Authority Quality Assurance strategy facing capacity problems in LPAs
- IHBC ‘Groups’ now in place to offer volunteers opportunities and support to address comparable concerns
- … disappointed not to get full membership and hardly any feedback given as to why…
- See B in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Free service, with pre-registration process and response letters as standard, overseen by senior trustee, and substantial effort put in by volunteers:
- Case may lie outside more recent support infrastructure
- How effective is the Code of Practice ? How many members have been censured ? IHBC seems to be reluctant to discuss this issue.
- See A in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Code of Conduct reviewed in Branch Connection Day in 2012 no substantive need for changes articulated: https://www.ihbc.org.uk/branches/branch_con_days/index.html
- The IHBC rest too much on its laurels and the work of others
- See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Business Plans with targeted agreed by members in 2007, 2010 (CP10), 2015 (CP20)
- CP2007-10 (https://www.ihbc.org.uk/business/docs/AGM%20Item%205%20-%20IHBC%20Corporate%20Plan%202007-2010.pdf) achievements included:
- Specification of new structures for national and branch committees and financial management
- First outlines for Disciplinary Procedures, and welcomed at 2010 AGM: https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=1284
- CP10: https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=11445
- 90% targets achieved in whole or part: 50 of 65 Priority 1 targets fully achieved or surpassed: c7 not achieved (CapacityBuild; Honorary Associates; Consultations guidelines; Enterprises plan (x2); Fundraising committee; Green links
- 80% Priority 2 achieved in whole or part, (7 not achieved): c.20% not achieved
- CP2007-10 (https://www.ihbc.org.uk/business/docs/AGM%20Item%205%20-%20IHBC%20Corporate%20Plan%202007-2010.pdf) achievements included:
- CP20:
- Under progress, but achievements already include:
- Conservation Professional Practice Principles and linked promotion
- Sector-leading web site and online services (including service provision and business advice to bodies such as COTAC): https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=17850
- Too narrow/preach to the converted
- See C in Https://ihbconline.co.uk/newsachive/?p=20044and
- Historic outreach includes Yearbook circulation (5500); Branch network;
- Recent includes Designing Buildings Wiki (https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Home) partnership and Conservation Wiki service (https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Conservation_wiki) which links IHBC NewsBlogs and updates to service .5M users p.a. across construction sector:
- Expanded circulation of Context etc: https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=17878 – ‘we are now offering boxes of c.60 copies and more for free, for distribution at relevant events or by key user and stakeholder groups.’
- See C in Https://ihbconline.co.uk/newsachive/?p=20044and
- I’d still like to see IHBC and CiFA combined
- See https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044 and
- MOU agreed between IHBC and CIfA acknowledges distinct practice standards, priorities and skills sets: https://www.ihbc.org.uk/resources/IHBC-CIfA-MoU-FINAL-8-May-2016-2.pdf
- I am a little concerned about ‘advocacy’ which can start as ‘helping’ but may end as promoting methods and materials which are somebody’s current favourite
- I appreciate that meeting all of these demands, to a high level, is a tall order for a relatively small organisation with limited resources and funding (in comparison to, say, the RTPI, RIBA or RICS) but it is something we have to continually strive to do
- See https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- MOUs (and equivalent) arrangements in place: https://www.ihbc.org.uk/mous/index.html
- I do find it absurd that the IHBC tells me little about actual conservation items such as consultations
- Space precludes individual mention of most consultations on our core information service the NewsBlogs, and the Consulations Panel and page have been generally considered as the resource focus for these interests (https://www.ihbc.org.uk/resources_head/consultations/index.html)
- Recognising the concern and the logic, regular ‘Consultations update’ NewsBlogs post are now planned
- No breadth
- See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- See membership profile at https://ihbc.org.uk/policy/docs/IHBC%20Briefing%20Note%20August%202016.pdf
- Distance constraints from local branch meetings
- ..unfriendly…
- See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- IHBC+ well received as strategy to open access
- New officer tranches, eg: https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=15950 and https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=16178
- There is a bit of a closed inner circle. Not always the most able people.
- See 16 above
- I would like there to be more events to attend, I often don’t find out about things until the last minute and then can’t attend
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, especially Branch Event NewsBlog
- It is largely geared towards local authority employees and not those in private practice.
- See questions 3 and 4 in Appendix 2 above
- The regional office was hard to contact and keep up contact with.
- See D in Appendix12 above, with Branch allocations increased to £750 pa in 2017
- Too political
- Include more regional news / links in email bulletins
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, especially Branch Event NewsBlog
- Branch event NewsBlog: https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=18008
- more regular communications from Branch
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, especially Branch Event NewsBlog
- would like to see more events/engagement (CPD, networking – even informally) at branch level to promote more interaction with the membership
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, especially Branch Event NewsBlog
- Give more funding and support to local branches
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, especially Branch Event NewsBlog
- IHBC regionally can be fairly invisible
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, especially Branch Event NewsBlog
- Include maybe a monthly update on current items of interest?
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, especially Branch Event NewsBlog
- Provide more support to private sector heritage consultants
- See B, C and E in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Switch from Transmit to Receive
- See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044 for inclusion strategy
- ‘Comments’ on NewsBlogs tested and rejected in 2016: https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=14310
- Feedback loops for HESPR notices (since July 2017: https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=16075) and NewsBlogs (2018) based on classification of ‘usefulness’ (via email valuing from 1-10)
- Communicating up and coming meetings in a timely manner
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, especially Branch Event NewsBlog
- Currently re-focussing on plans for all Committees, national and local
- List places needing volunteers etc
- Capacity Build strategy under discussion since Corporate Plan 2007-10, and still in CP20, but priorities and capacity precluded delivery
- Ask members to get involved in the newsletter
- See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044 for inclusion strategy
- Previously a ‘Suggest News’ link for the NewsBlog produced almost no returns
- Regular calls for content for Context
- A young members group would be good
- Invitation in place to establish an IHBC Group for these interests
- Stop being the ACO by another name
- See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- See questions 3, 4 and 19 in Appendix 2 above
- Be more useful to me as working professional by becoming more professional yourselves
- See A, B and C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- See ‘ToolBox’ and ‘Conservation Professional Practice Principles’
- Involve a wider range of experts and professions…. There is very little for architects, nothing for engineers or quantity surveyors; and very little for carpenters and masons.
- See A and E.b and C.d in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- MOU with sector link body COTAC ( https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=18209) and ongoing communications via Designing Buldings Wiki (https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Home) and including Conservation Wiki at: https://www.designingbuildings.co.uk/wiki/Conservation_wiki
- Events and stands at partner/body events (where affordable): e.g. CIOB
- Permanent call out for contributions to Context (https://ihbc.org.uk/page55/context/index.html), with theming of issues tied to Areas of Competence under Communications Strategy:
- … I often find the amenity groups including IHBC seem to have limited understanding of outside of a specific architectural or principle setting as a pressure group.
- Recognising that IHBC is not an amenity group, see A, B and E in Https://ihbconline.co.uk/newsachive/?p=20044
- Facebook groups (or similar group platform) for each region
- See D in Https://ihbconline.co.uk/newsachive/?p=20044
- Promotional document for Branches under way with Support officer, that can highlight the potential and value of these.
- Link-up with other Heritage organisations such as SPAB, Georgian and Victorian Societies
- See C.e and E.b in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Introductory MATE sessions for JCNAS
- Promotional partnerships under way with the Listed Property Owners Club (https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=18204) and Civic Voice, as well as membership and support of link national bodies with heritage interests (Heritage Alliance; BEFS etc)
- Strive to achieve better working relationships between those in private practice and those working in local authorities
- See C.e and E.b in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Specific cross-sector practice-based initiative from SW Branch being promoted via Education committee
- Code
- The accreditation process for membership I have just gone through is unnecessarily arduous
- Standards a priority: see A and B in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Provide a mentor scheme
- Piloted and reviewed, and precluded by capacity and risk, but elective option for Branches
- Reference to conservation officers demonstrating their ‘management and financial’ issues mis-understands both the role and the relevance of this area to accreditation.
- Unclear
- More events. Cheaper events. Better communication of events. Greater engagement in practical trades/craft skills
- Increase opportunities for involvement without having to be a branch/committee member.
- See E in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- See D.e in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, such as the Harbours group https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HHtr5lxnbfc&t=0s&index=10&list=PL4V-VYwTrjM3ayl67AsEyO26chwTuOfgl
- Be upfront about the time likely to be required to enable a realistic decision to be made regarding involvement in any particular task
- See D.c in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044, including job and person specifications and outline commitments
- Historic obligations not necessarily as measure for the future given enhanced staffing and new structures around IHBC+ (See C in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044)
- Ultimately guilty!
- Appeal to a wider range of levels
- See D and E in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Support and promote committees and Branches via IHBC+
- See C and D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- … whilst conservation practitioners (private or local authority) are able to practice without membership, there is little incentive for them to get through the rigorous entry process..
- See A, B and E in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- Currently exploring a LPA Quality Assurance system
- The difficulty the centre seems to have in controlling the public engagement by some of its regional branches can make the IHBC occasionally look unprofessional and this does the organisation no favours
- See D in https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044
- New Branch standards tied to Code of Conduct and linked practice standards under development.
- Under progress, but achievements already include:
For the initial background and responses see https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20011 and for the summary see https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=20044.
For more background DOWNLOAD the Corporate Plan
See ‘IHBC’s ‘5 minute member survey’ launched’ at https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=17384 and reminder at https://newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk/?p=17554