A new Research Report published by Government explores ‘Impacts of public services being delivered by civil society organisations.
Government UK writes:
Civil society organisations have long played a vital role in delivering public services in the UK, bringing distinctive qualities such as local knowledge, community trust, and flexible, person-centred approaches. The Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) commissioned this research to develop a Theory of Change articulating how and why civil society involvement in public service delivery generates value—supporting the implementation of the Civil Society Covenant and informing future policy.
This report provides an articulation of the pathways through which civil society creates impact. It identifies five key inputs (funding, enabling policy environment, infrastructure, human capital, and trusted partnerships) that support civil society activities, operating through three core mechanisms:
- Holistic, person-centred approaches that address root causes and multiple needs simultaneously
- Trusted early interventions enabled by deep community embeddedness
- Safe, supportive environments that foster belonging and enable earlier engagement with support
These mechanisms are theorised to generate outcomes at individual/household, community, and organisational levels – ultimately contributing to stronger communities, improved life chances, and more effective local systems.
While robust comparative evidence remains limited, the available research consistently demonstrates positive outcomes from civil society-led interventions, providing a foundation for the theoretical model presented here. The targeted evidence scan revealed that most available studies score at Level 2 or below on the Maryland Scientific Methods Scale (SMS), meaning they show associations and trends but cannot prove causation. Critically, there is limited comparative research examining whether civil society delivery of public services produces better outcomes than equivalent public or private sector provision. This makes it difficult to definitively demonstrate civil society’s ‘comparative advantage’ beyond theoretical arguments.
To address this evidence gap, the report recommends prioritising comparative cross-sector research, convening a multi-stakeholder evidence working group, developing simplified messaging to communicate civil society’s role, and exploring opportunities for greater data linkage across government departments. Without this investment in evidence, policy decisions will continue to rely on indicative rather than conclusive data about civil society’s impact on public services.
To read the report go to the following link:
See more on the IHBC’s Competences
