{"id":987,"date":"2010-01-15T13:19:24","date_gmt":"2010-01-15T13:19:24","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=987"},"modified":"2010-03-24T13:19:41","modified_gmt":"2010-03-24T13:19:41","slug":"pos-seeks-funding-for-ipc-burdens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=987","title":{"rendered":"POS seeks funding for IPC burdens"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Planning Officers Society has  written to planning minister John Healey to ask for specific financial  help for councils involved with proposals for nationally significant  infrastructure projects like power stations, motorways, ports and new  reservoirs.<\/p>\n<p>The Society, which represents professional staff  working in local authority planning services, claims the new planning  regime for such schemes involves new responsibilities but less financial  resources for local authorities as they do not receive planning  application fees. Those will be paid to the newly-established  Infrastructure Planning Commission.<\/p>\n<p>Local authorities will play a  key role in the new system, working with developers and the local  community. Councils will help assess the public consultation by  developers and produce a local impact report, detailed guidance on which  will be published by the Government.<\/p>\n<p>In his letter to Mr Healey,  Society president David Hackforth claimed that the new regime places  extra burdens on local authorities and urged \u201cappropriate steps to  provide councils with the extra resources needed to discharge these new  responsibilities\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>The Society has made it clear that it is  supporting the case made by Copeland Borough Council which is faced with  major new nuclear generation plans.<\/p>\n<p>Copeland has told Mr Healey  that \u201cthose authorities that find they are dealing with a nationally  significant infrastructure project will have an unusually large workload  to deal with compared with other planning applications. In order to  assess the impacts of the project and the steps needed to mitigate them  for the purposes of the Local Impact Report, a variety of specialist  commissions, by their nature costly, will be needed over a sustained  period starting well before an application is made\u201d.<\/p>\n<p>Under the  current system local authorities already look closely at any major  infrastructure projects proposed in their area and engage with  developers on potential applications. Councils also bear their own costs  for their involvement in any inquiry held by the Planning Inspectorate  and enforce conditions. Under the new regime, where councils provide  discretionary services they have the power to recover these costs. It  will be in the interest of promoters to ensure that councils are able to  engage as fully as possible in the planning process for major  infrastructure, to ensure that as many matters as possible can be  resolved at an early stage.<\/p>\n<p>A Communities and Local Government  spokesperson said: &#8220;The new system under the IPC will be faster, fairer  and save the country up to \u00a3300m every year. Current planning inquiries  can last years and require councils to pay for a significant amount of  expensive legal representation. The new regime intends to reduce these  costs, and it is up to individual authorities to decide how they engage  with the process.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>In a separate but related development,  environmental groups and the Sustainable Development Commission have  told Parliament that the energy suite of draft National Policy  Statements are not fit for purpose.<\/p>\n<p>The organisations, which  include the Town and Country Planning Association, WWF, Friends of the  Earth, Greenpeace, the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds and the  Campaign to Protect Rural England, have been giving evidence to the  Commons Energy and Climate Change Committee.<\/p>\n<p>They have complained  that the IPC is hamstrung because it cannot deal with need issues or  pronounce on the carbon emission implications of schemes. They  criticised the energy NPSs for lack of spatial context and a failure to  provide sufficient guidance on the appropriate energy mix.<\/p>\n<p>Representatives  from the organisations also told MPs that the Government\u2019s consultation  exercise was flawed and probably breached its own best practice  guidance on public participation as well as the Aarhus Convention, the  relevant UN treaty.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/government\/news\/archive\/2010\/jan\/2010_01_week_2\/140110_1\" href=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/government\/news\/archive\/2010\/jan\/2010_01_week_2\/140110_1\">Link  to Planning Portal News Article <\/a><br \/>\n<a title=\"http:\/\/www.planningofficers.org.uk\/file\/4625bb75ce8a96b05d192670ff0f9a86\/\" href=\"http:\/\/www.planningofficers.org.uk\/file\/4625bb75ce8a96b05d192670ff0f9a86\/\">Link  to Planning Officers Society Article<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Planning Officers Society has written to planning minister John Healey to ask for specific financial help for councils involved with proposals for nationally significant infrastructure projects like power stations, motorways, ports and new reservoirs. The Society, which represents professional &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=987\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=987"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/987\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":988,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/987\/revisions\/988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}