{"id":924,"date":"2009-12-17T11:37:02","date_gmt":"2009-12-17T11:37:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=924"},"modified":"2010-03-24T11:37:24","modified_gmt":"2010-03-24T11:37:24","slug":"consult-on-pps-re-draft-cms-clg-committees","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=924","title":{"rendered":"Consult on PPS re-draft&#8217;: CMS &#038; CLG committees"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In a move widely welcomed by parties  seriously concerned by the first draft of PPS 15, Planning and the  Historic Environment, the CLG and CMS Parliamentary Committees have  joined together to call for substantial consultation and scrutiny across  the sector of the promised redraft.<\/p>\n<p>In a letter to the Minister  for Planning, John Healey MP, Dr Phyllis Starkey MP, Chair, CLG  Committee &amp; John Whittingdale MP, Chairman, CMS Committee, write:<\/p>\n<p>\u2018We  write following the receipt by both of our Committees of a significant  amount of correspondence from interested parties concerning the  recently-published draft planning policy statement on the historic  environment (PPS15). It appears that there is a considerable degree of  concern amongst a range of stakeholders about the proposals contained in  this draft.<\/p>\n<p>We understand that you have noted these concerns,  and you are reported as having said<\/p>\n<p>The current language in the  planning policy statement is not clear enough. We will redraft it to  make clear that the protection of heritage buildings will not be  reduced&#8230;<br \/>\nThe consultation shows that there is some confusion,  which we will clear up before we publish the final statement.<\/p>\n<p>In  the light of the concerns which have been raised with us, we are  pleased to see that you are committed to redrafting the statement.  However, we note that you have not committed yourself to consulting  stakeholders on the redrafted PPS to ensure that their concerns have  been appropriately addressed.<\/p>\n<p>Our Committees have no current  plans to take oral evidence on this PPS. However, the weight of opinion  amongst stakeholders is such that they may wish to consider doing so if  stakeholders&#8217; concerns are not allayed. A commitment to ensuring that  there is adequate opportunity to comment on the redrafted policy before  it is finalised would, we are sure, go some way towards reassuring not  only stakeholders but also our two Committees that the Government is  treating their concerns seriously.<\/p>\n<p>We are copying this letter to  the Institute of Historic Building Conservation, APT, the UK  Association of Preservation Trusts, the Historic Towns Forum, Heritage  Link, the Joint Committee of the National Amenity Societies and the  Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings, all of whom have been  in correspondence with us on this matter.\u2019<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"http:\/\/www.ihbc.org.uk\/news\/docs\/LetterfromChairmanCLG_Chairman_to_JohnHealey141209.pdf\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ihbc.org.uk\/news\/docs\/LetterfromChairmanCLG_Chairman_to_JohnHealey141209.pdf\">Download  the letter here<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>In a move widely welcomed by parties seriously concerned by the first draft of PPS 15, Planning and the Historic Environment, the CLG and CMS Parliamentary Committees have joined together to call for substantial consultation and scrutiny across the sector &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=924\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-924","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=924"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":925,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/924\/revisions\/925"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=924"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=924"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=924"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}