{"id":798,"date":"2009-11-11T18:50:17","date_gmt":"2009-11-11T18:50:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=798"},"modified":"2010-03-23T18:50:44","modified_gmt":"2010-03-23T18:50:44","slug":"rtpi-critical-of-pd-proposals","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=798","title":{"rendered":"RTPI critical of PD proposals"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI)  has responded to the government&#8217;s consultation on changing permitted  development rights.<\/p>\n<p>The consultation, Improving Permitted  Development, aims to simplify the planning process for smaller scale  applications for educational institutions, industry, offices, shops and  warehousing. The document follows the Killian-Pretty review&#8217;s call to  cut red tape for minor non-domestic development. In its response, the  RTPI has warned that whilst it supports the aim of the reforms, the  current proposals are &#8220;complicated and imprecise&#8221; and may lead to &#8220;more  uncertainty and confusion rather than less&#8221;.<\/p>\n<p>Matt Thomson,  acting director Policy &amp; Partnerships, RTPI said: &#8220;The new  regulations are complicated, and do not provide the clarity that  applicants and planners need, despite the lessons learnt from the 2008  changes to householder consents. Like the householder permitted  development changes introduced last year, the new regulations will shift  rather than reduce the workload of planning officers and will place  further burdens on planning enforcement within local authorities.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Enforcement  is the basis of quality control for planning, and is crucial to the  credibility of the system. The lack of clarity and consistency of  definitions in the consultation will only serve to undermine public  confidence in planning. The new regulations are not always expressed  clearly, especially in regard to extensions allowed to schools and  universities .It appears that the potential negative impact of  extensions to shops and business premises on neighbouring properties and  and the character of areas has not been taken into account. A reduced  type of planning permission, known as \u2018prior approval\u2019 is introduced for  some developments when it is well known that this kind of application  already causes confusion where it is used in the planning system in  respect of other uses. There is also a lack of joined up thinking: while  Government policy rightly highlights tackling climate change as a key  priority for the planning system, the proposal to allow air conditioning  units to be installed without planning permission runs completely  contrary to this agenda &#8211; not to mention the visual impact and increase  in noise pollution that a proliferation of such units across the country  would entail. We are not convinced that these plans will have a  significant impact on reducing the burden on small businesses. In fact  the suggested changes would make the system more complicated not less  which is why we cannot support these proposals in their current form.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"http:\/\/www.rtpi.org.uk\/item\/3051\/23\/5\/3\" href=\"http:\/\/www.rtpi.org.uk\/item\/3051\/23\/5\/3\">Click here for details<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Royal Town Planning Institute (RTPI) has responded to the government&#8217;s consultation on changing permitted development rights. The consultation, Improving Permitted Development, aims to simplify the planning process for smaller scale applications for educational institutions, industry, offices, shops and warehousing. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=798\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-798","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=798"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":800,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/798\/revisions\/800"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}