{"id":5350,"date":"2013-01-25T18:15:29","date_gmt":"2013-01-25T18:15:29","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=5350"},"modified":"2013-01-25T18:15:29","modified_gmt":"2013-01-25T18:15:29","slug":"ihbc-on-clg-committee-on-taylor","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=5350","title":{"rendered":"IHBC, on CLG Committee, on Taylor!"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">The IHBC has submitted its evidence in the Communities and Local Government (CLG) Committee inquiry into key conclusions of the review of government planning practice guidance, the \u2018Taylor Review\u2019.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">The IHBC writes<\/span>:<br \/>\n1.In principle we support the proposal to replace Government planning guidance with a single structured on-line resource.<\/p>\n<p>2. We also support the proposal to leave \u2018best practice guidance\u2019 to specialist bodies with the proviso set out in the Review that this would be signposted from the new on-line Resource.<\/p>\n<p>3. We think best practice guidance needs proper recognition as such as it would carry little weight in planning cases without this. We would hope that \u2018signposting\u2019 would do more than just imply this. It is important, particularly in appeal and other high profile cases\u00a0that the planning profession understands exactly what is reckoned to be \u201cbest practice\u201d on\u00a0a given topic.<\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">For the full details and current consultations see<\/span>: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ihbc.org.uk\/resources\/consultations\/consultations.html\" target=\"_blank\">LINK <\/a><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">See and search consultation responses at<\/span>: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ihbc.org.uk\/resources\/consultations\/consult_responses\/consult_responses.html\" target=\"_blank\">LINK<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The IHBC has submitted its evidence in the Communities and Local Government (CLG) Committee inquiry into key conclusions of the review of government planning practice guidance, the \u2018Taylor Review\u2019. The IHBC writes: 1.In principle we support the proposal to replace &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=5350\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-5350","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5350","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=5350"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5350\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5351,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/5350\/revisions\/5351"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=5350"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=5350"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=5350"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}