{"id":4329,"date":"2012-06-15T15:37:39","date_gmt":"2012-06-15T15:37:39","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=4329"},"modified":"2013-05-30T09:55:10","modified_gmt":"2013-05-30T09:55:10","slug":"ihbc-partners-press-vat-raid-pressure-with-feature-in-times","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=4329","title":{"rendered":"IHBC & partners press \u2018VAT raid\u2019 pressure with feature in Times\u2026"},"content":{"rendered":"

The IHBC has welcomed the success of its continuing partnerships in anti-\u2018Heritage VAT raid\u2019 initiatives, as the Cut the Vat coalition secured a major press feature in the Times on 14 June, alongside a joint-authored letter, highlighting the public outcry over the recent VAT changes for key listed building works.<\/span><\/p>\n

The Cut the VAT Campaign, of which IHBC is a member, reports<\/span>:
\nSixteen organisations have written to the Chancellor of the Exchequer to urge a further review of the proposed implementation of VAT on alterations to listed buildings before it is too late. In the letter organisations representing countryside, heritage and construction industry interests warned the Chancellor that the planned tax rise would damage the UK\u2019s historic buildings and argued the plans were based inadequate evidence.<\/p>\n

The text of the letter reads<\/span>:<\/p>\n

Dear Chancellor,<\/p>\n

Despite recent u-turns on a VAT hike for pasties and caravans, the Treasury is still planning a 20% tax rise that will damage the nation’s finest and most loved buildings. Worse still, this tax rise is based on completely insufficient evidence. When the Treasury announced plans to remove the current VAT relief on approved alterations to listed buildings in the Budget it stated that the majority of the work covered by the relief was not necessary for heritage purposes. A Freedom of Information request has subsequently revealed that this was based on a sample of just 105 cases despite the fact there are almost 30,000 Listed Building Consent applications during the course of a year.<\/p>\n

Since the Budget, ministers have repeatedly told MPs and the public that this VAT increase was about stopping millionaires installing swimming pools tax free. When we looked at a sample of 12,049 recent applications for listed building consent from across the UK, we found only 34 applications for swimming pools. According to the clear guidance from HMRC less than half of these had any chance of qualifying for the VAT relief.<\/p>\n

50% of people who live in listed buildings are in socio-economic groups C1, C2, D and E. So why does the Treasury continue to feed MPs with the swimming pool line and encourage them to send it on to angry constituents who are rightly concerned about the future of the buildings they cherish, care for and rely on?<\/p>\n

The decision to provide additional compensation to listed places of worship demonstrates the Government\u2019s admission that the VAT increase will put our historic buildings at risk, but offers nothing to help community centres, town halls, village halls or privately owned listed buildings.<\/p>\n

We are already seeing evidence of projects that have been cancelled or put on hold as charities worry about how to raise an additional 20% and projects become unaffordable. This is having a negative impact on the construction industry at a time when weak demand is holding back wider economic recovery.<\/p>\n

As Chancellor, we want you to recognise the risks are simply too high to carry on as planned and therefore we call on you to review the proposed implementation of VAT on alterations to listed buildings before it is introduced \u2013 before it is too late.<\/p>\n

Yours sincerely,<\/p>\n

Signatories<\/span>:
\nPeter Anslow; Managing Director; Listed Property Owners Club
\nBrian Berry; Chief Executive; Federation of Master Builders
\nSteve Bratt; Chief Executive; Electrical Contractors’ Association
\nHarry Cotterell; President; Country Land & Business Association
\nJulia Evans; Chief Executive; National Federation of Builders
\nJulia Goodwin; Editor; House Beautiful
\nEdward Harley; President; Historic Houses Association
\nDavid Heath; Chairman; Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings
\nDr No\u00ebl James; Director; Historic Towns Forum
\nAndrew Leech; Executive Director; National Home Improvement Council
\nDr Se\u00e1n O’Reilly, Director, The Institute of Historic Building Conservation
\nYvonne Orgill, Chief Executive, Bathroom Manufacturers Association
\nKate Pugh, Chief Executive, The Heritage Alliance
\nNigel Rees, Group Chief Executive, Glass and Glazing Federation
\nShaun Spiers, Chief Executive, Campaign to Protect Rural England
\nSir Barney White-Spunner KCB CBE, Executive Chairman, Countryside Alliance<\/p>\n

Download the open letter<\/span>: HERE <\/a><\/p>\n

For the article and full letter in the Times see (subscription)<\/span>: www.thetimes.co.uk<\/a><\/p>\n

For links to the Times article and letter see<\/span>: LINK<\/a><\/p>\n

Cut the VAT Article<\/span>: LINK<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

The IHBC has welcomed the success of its continuing partnerships in anti-\u2018Heritage VAT raid\u2019 initiatives, as the Cut the Vat coalition secured a major press feature in the Times on 14 June, alongside a joint-authored letter, highlighting the public outcry … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4329","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ihbc-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4329","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4329"}],"version-history":[{"count":4,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4329\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":5882,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4329\/revisions\/5882"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4329"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4329"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4329"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}