{"id":4175,"date":"2012-05-11T17:21:23","date_gmt":"2012-05-11T17:21:23","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=4175"},"modified":"2012-05-15T10:14:49","modified_gmt":"2012-05-15T10:14:49","slug":"eh-on-the-nppf-heritage-perspectives","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=4175","title":{"rendered":"EH on the NPPF: heritage perspectives"},"content":{"rendered":"

English Heritage (EH) has produced explanatory guidance on its interpretation of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) – including the relevance of the \u2018Practice Guide\u2019 to the now-withdrawn PPS 5 – all supported by an online presentation by Mike Harlow and Duncan McCallum, and free NPPF Discussion Sessions around the country.<\/span><\/p>\n

English Heritage writes:<\/span>
\nThe National Planning Policy Framework was published on 27 March 2012, replacing all the previous Planning Policy Statements, including PPS 5, as well as various other planning guidance. Its central theme is the \u2018presumption in favour of sustainable development\u2019, set out in twelve core land-use planning principles which underpin both plan-making and decision-taking.<\/p>\n

Although matters relevant to the historic environment are scattered throughout these principles, particularly design, urban and countryside policies, it is the section on Conserving and Enhancing the Historic Environment which supersedes PPS 5, whilst following that document\u2019s significance-led approach to decision-taking.<\/p>\n

English Heritage has produced two comparison documents for ease of reference; one compares the NPPF historic environment policies to those in PPS 5, and the other gives information on additional policies in the NPPF not mentioned in PPS 5.<\/p>\n

The Practice Guide remains a valid and Government endorsed document pending Government’s review of guidance supporting national planning policy.<\/p>\n

NPPF Discussion Sessions<\/span><\/p>\n

Free half day sessions will provide an opportunity to discuss English Heritage’s interpretation of the NPPF in order to promote understanding of NPPF, its implications for the management of heritage assets, and its use in plan and decision-making.\u00a0 The session will explore the language and terminology used in NPPF and how this differs from the PPS5.<\/p>\n

They will give delegates an opportunity to interact with a broad cross section of interests; the events are open to Local Planning Authority officers, planners, elected members, heritage professionals, consultants & developers, amenity groups and the voluntary sector.<\/p>\n

Please contact Sam Powell at train@english-heritage.org.uk<\/a> to reserve your place.<\/p>\n

\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 11 May. London.<\/a>
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 15 May. Cambridge.<\/a>
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 21 May. Newcastle.<\/a>
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 29 May. Birmingham.<\/a>
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 12 June. Nottingham.<\/a>
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 19 June. Manchester.<\/a>
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 25 June. Guildford.<\/a>
\n\u00b7\u00a0\u00a0 27 June. Bristol.<\/a><\/p>\n

Link to the Practice Guide at<\/span>: LINK <\/a><\/p>\n

Helm Article 1<\/span>: LINK<\/a><\/p>\n

Helm Article 2: LINK<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

English Heritage (EH) has produced explanatory guidance on its interpretation of the National Planning Policy Framework (NPPF) – including the relevance of the \u2018Practice Guide\u2019 to the now-withdrawn PPS 5 – all supported by an online presentation by Mike Harlow … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4175","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4175","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=4175"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4175\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":4191,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4175\/revisions\/4191"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=4175"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=4175"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=4175"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}