{"id":37181,"date":"2023-08-04T17:44:31","date_gmt":"2023-08-04T16:44:31","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newsblogsnew.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=37181"},"modified":"2023-08-04T17:44:31","modified_gmt":"2023-08-04T16:44:31","slug":"bre-poor-housing-will-cost-135-5bn-over-30-years-but-9bn-investment-would-pay-back-on-nhs-social-savings-alone","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=37181","title":{"rendered":"BRE: Poor housing will cost \u00a3135.5bn+ over 30 years\u2026 but \u00a39bn investment would pay back on NHS &#038; social savings alone"},"content":{"rendered":"<section class=\"full_width\">\n<div class=\"content clearfix\">\n<h3><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-34988\" src=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/11\/housing_open_government_licence_v3.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"195\" \/>BRE\u2019s latest analysis quantifies the vast cost of England\u2019s poor quality homes &#8211; \u00a39bn to improve 2.4mn poor homes in England would pay for itself within 9 years based only on NHS savings and wider social pay back of \u00a3135.5bn over the next 30 years.<\/h3>\n<h6><em>image: for illustration &#8211; Open Government Licence v3.0<\/em><\/h6>\n<h3><!--more--><\/h3>\n<h2 style=\"padding-left: 40px;\"><em><span style=\"color: #800080;\">\u2026\u2018Improving poor housing has huge implications for\u2026.life chances\u2026\u2019<\/span><\/em><\/h2>\n<p>BRE writes:<\/p>\n<p>A new cost-benefit analysis published today by the Building Research Establishment (BRE) has revealed that remedial work to England\u2019s poorest housing could provide \u00a3135.5 billion (bn) in societal benefits over the next 30 years. These benefits include savings to the NHS, lower energy bills and carbon emissions, higher asset values and improved economic opportunities as a result of better health.<\/p>\n<p>BRE\u2019s latest report\u00a0updates its 2021 research and outlines a 30-year cost-benefit analysis of the impact of improving poor housing in England\u2019. The Cost of Ignoring Poor Housing quantifies the enormous cost burden of England\u2019s poor housing to wider society.<\/p>\n<p>For the 2.4 million (mn) homes in England identified as having one of the most serious health and safety hazards, remedial works would cost \u00a39bn. If all this work could be undertaken immediately, there would be accrued benefits of \u00a3135.5bn over the next 30 years. This includes \u00a313bn of savings to the NHS. Currently, the NHS is estimated to be spending over \u00a31bn a year on treating people affected by poor quality housing. Based only on the NHS savings, let alone the wider benefits, the \u00a39bn investment would pay for itself within 9 years.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n<section class=\"full_width\">\n<div class=\"content clearfix\">\n<p>It is unlikely to be practically possible to identify and undertake all the work required to make England\u2019s housing stock healthy and safe immediately. To help target action, and as part of its latest report, BRE has designed a cost-benefit model that can be used to assess the costs and benefits of taking action on different hazards under different scenarios&#8230;..<\/p>\n<p>According to BRE\u2019s research, improving the 65,000 homes with a Category 1 damp and mould hazard would only cost \u00a3250mn, unlocking \u00a34.8bn in societal benefit over the next 30 years if this work was to be undertaken immediately.<\/p>\n<p>Gillian Charlesworth, CEO, BRE, commented: \u201cOur analysis is a clear signal to policymakers that investing in the health and safety of England\u2019s poor housing will deliver significant, long-term economic and societal benefits. Up until now, no serious attempt has been made to examine and quantify the longer-term costs and benefits if the worst health and safety hazards were removed from England\u2019s substandard housing.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cImproving poor housing has huge implications for the life chances of the families who live in those homes, and benefits to society as a whole. Whether it\u2019s a young family living with cold, damp and mould, or an older person at risk from falls, nobody should live in a home that\u2019s unsafe. But our research shows there is much more than a moral case for tackling unsafe homes. There is also a powerful economic argument for England and the UK to deliver the improvements needed, through targeted and timely programmes of work to reap the financial payback.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cBy building on our previous research, we hope to further inform local and national government where the most problematic homes are and provide a foundation for dedicating strategic resources to remediate poor housing for the benefit of individuals, the national economy, and wider society.\u201d<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/bregroup.com\/press-releases\/poor-housing-will-cost-over-135-5bn-over-the-next-30-years-without-urgent-action\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read more&#8230;.<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/section>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>BRE\u2019s latest analysis quantifies the vast cost of England\u2019s poor quality homes &#8211; \u00a39bn to improve 2.4mn poor homes in England would pay for itself within 9 years based only on NHS savings and wider social pay back of \u00a3135.5bn &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=37181\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=37181"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37181\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37182,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37181\/revisions\/37182"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=37181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=37181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=37181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}