{"id":30414,"date":"2021-06-25T17:00:59","date_gmt":"2021-06-25T16:00:59","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newsblogsnew.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=30414"},"modified":"2021-06-25T18:22:10","modified_gmt":"2021-06-25T17:22:10","slug":"ihbcs-features-heritage-from-the-engineers-doorstep-reparations-sought-in-highways-england-bridge-row-as-24-historic-railway-structures-face-demolition-or-infill","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=30414","title":{"rendered":"IHBC\u2019s features \u2018Heritage from the (engineers\u2019) doorstep\u2019: Reparations sought in Highways England bridge row as 24 historic railway structures face demolition or infilling"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Two heritage railways in Cumbria, whose plans to unite have been thrown into doubt by Highways England\u2019s aggressive infilling of an historic railway bridge, have asked the company to undo the work or fund the structure\u2019s excavation and repair, while the HRE Group<\/a> has highlighted the 24 most noteworthy structures facing demolition or infilling under Highways England\u2019s controversial plan.<\/h3>\n

<\/p>\n

\u2026 HRE Group are spread out across the country along 17 different routes\u2026<\/span><\/em><\/h2>\n

\u2026\u201ccollective dismay and huge disappointment\u201d at the infilling\u2026<\/span><\/em><\/h2>\n

New Civil Engineer<\/em> writes:<\/p>\n

\u2026 The structures are part of the Historical Railways Estate managed by Highways England on behalf of the DfT and comprises 3,800 bridges, tunnels and viaducts, including 77 listed structures. Jacobs acts as the ‘sole provider’ (designer) for the Historical Railways Estate and has just been reappointed for another seven years.<\/p>\n

Six contractors will support Jacobs in carrying out any work…<\/p>\n

The 24 structures identified by The HRE Group are spread out across the country along 17 different routes \u2013 23 of them involve demolition or infilling bridges, while one relates to a disused tunnel. (See full breakdown below.)<\/p>\n

Read more….<\/a><\/p>\n

\n

Rail UK<\/em> writes:<\/p>\n

Two heritage railways in Cumbria, whose plans to unite have been thrown into doubt by Highways England infilling an old railway bridge, have asked the company to undo the work or fund the structure\u2019s excavation and repair.<\/p>\n

The Eden Valley and Stainmore railways first formulated plans to reopen the line between Appleby and Kirkby Stephen East Station in 1995. Two sections have since been completed, but the five-mile connecting route has recently been blocked by the state-owned roads company whose contractor has installed hundreds of tonnes of aggregate and concrete to bury the Victorian bridge at Great Musgrave.<\/p>\n

Highways England claimed that infilling was needed to \u201cprevent further deterioration of the bridge from occurring and remove the associated risk of structural collapse and harm to the public\u201d. But documents obtained by the two railways reveal that inspectors had no concerns about the bridge\u2019s condition and \u00a35K of repointing would have increased its capacity to 40 tonnes, making it safe for any vehicle to pass over. Infilling has cost \u00a3124K.<\/p>\n

In a letter to Nick Harris, Highways England\u2019s Acting Chief Executive, the Stainmore Railway\u2019s Project Manager, Mike Thompson, and John Sreeves, Civil Engineering Director with the Eden Valley Railway, express their \u201ccollective dismay and huge disappointment\u201d at the infilling and ask why they were not consulted about the plans. Highways England has claimed that they were, but this is flatly denied by the two railways. It is \u201cjust one example of how HE has distorted the truth\u201d…<\/p>\n

David Wheatley, Highways England\u2019s Head of Scheme Delivery, recently asserted that his company\u2019s ongoing programme of 130 nationwide infilling and demolition schemes would not \u201cthwart any potential active travel schemes\u2026\u201d.<\/p>\n

This statement is challenged by Mr Thompson and Mr Sreeves who have asked Nick Harris why his company twice ignored requests from Eden District Council to pause the infilling of Great Musgrave bridge \u2013 which did not have planning permission \u2013 whilst a \u201cdetailed investigation\u201d was undertaken.<\/p>\n

It is estimated that removal of the infill will cost many tens of thousands of pounds. The two railways already face the prospect of raising significant funds to deliver their future reconnection and say that it is \u201cgrossly unfair to the Eden Valley Railway Project that we should be penalised in this way\u201d.<\/p>\n

They go on, \u201cWe are therefore writing to formally request that you either please remove the infill forthwith and make good any damage to the structure, or grant funds to the SRC\/EVR to cover this work when the time is right.\u201d<\/p>\n

\u201cWe regard the actions of HE in respect of [the bridge] to be without justification and deeply detrimental to our longstanding goals. It is entirely appropriate that HE makes reparation for the significant additional cost and difficulty imposed on our future operations without prior consultation.\u201d\u2026<\/p>\n

Read more….<\/a><\/p>\n

See more at the Railway Ramblers: Please help the HRE Group\u2026<\/a><\/p>\n

See also HRE Group<\/a> and Change.org<\/a><\/p>\n

See Twitter pictures<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Two heritage railways in Cumbria, whose plans to unite have been thrown into doubt by Highways England\u2019s aggressive infilling of an historic railway bridge, have asked the company to undo the work or fund the structure\u2019s excavation and repair, while … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-30414","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ihbc-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30414","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=30414"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30414\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":30416,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/30414\/revisions\/30416"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=30414"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=30414"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=30414"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}