{"id":27225,"date":"2020-08-04T17:19:15","date_gmt":"2020-08-04T16:19:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/newsblogsnew.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=27225"},"modified":"2020-08-04T17:19:15","modified_gmt":"2020-08-04T16:19:15","slug":"ihbcs-new-toolbox-guidance-note-on-dill-supreme-court-judgement-when-is-a-listed-building-not-a-listed-building","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=27225","title":{"rendered":"IHBC\u2019s new ToolBox Guidance note on \u2018Dill\u2019 Supreme Court judgement: \u2018When is a listed building not a listed building&#8230;\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-medium wp-image-24870\" src=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/12\/IHBC_Toolbox_graphic-300x300.png\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"300\" \/>The IHBC\u2019s latest <a href=\"https:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/toolbox\/\">Toolbox<\/a> Guidance Note, drafted in consultation with the Institute\u2019s Legal Panel, reviews the recent Supreme Court conclusions in <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/2020-05-20_Dill-v-SoSStratford_SupremeCourt.pdf\">Dill v Secretary of State\u2026 [2020]<\/a>, answering \u2018When is a listed building not a listed building?\u2019 with:\u2018\u2026when it has insufficient size, permanence or physical attachment to be a building to begin with\u2019.<\/h3>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>IHBC Legal Panel convenor and guidance note author &#8211; and IHBC Vice Chair \u2013 Lone Le Vay said: \u2018The case considered the interpretation of \u2018building\u2019 for the purposes of the Planning (Listed Buildings and Conservation Areas) Act 1990, particularly in relation to objects and structures such as statues, garden ornaments and street furniture.<\/p>\n<p>Although the Supreme Court didn\u2019t determine whether the garden urns in the case were \u2018buildings\u2019 or not, they did confirm that the criteria in Skerritts of Nottingham Ltd v Secretary of State for the Environment, Transport and Regions (No 2) [2000] JPL 1025 for identifying a \u2018building\u2019 of size, permanence and degree of physical attachment are also relevant in the listed building context.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>\u2018The Supreme Court also held that it was possible to challenge all aspects of a planning decision at appeal, including whether the object or structure was a building for the purpose of being included on the statutory list of buildings of special architectural or historic interest.\u2019<\/p>\n<p>See the <a href=\"https:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/toolbox\/guidance_notes\/iddicote.html\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">IHBC Guidance Note<\/a><\/p>\n<p>See the IHBC\u2019s <a href=\"https:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/toolbox\/\">Toolbox<\/a><\/p>\n<p>See the <a href=\"https:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/toolbox\/guidance_notes\/index.html\">Guidance Notes<\/a><\/p>\n<p>Download the <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2020\/05\/2020-05-20_Dill-v-SoSStratford_SupremeCourt.pdf\">judgment<\/a><\/p>\n<p>See more <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=26475\">NewsBlog<\/a> background<\/p>\n<p>See more takes at <a href=\"https:\/\/www.planningresource.co.uk\/article\/1690186\/legal-viewpoint-court-ruling-sheds-light-challenging-questionable-listings\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener noreferrer\">Planning Resource<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The IHBC\u2019s latest Toolbox Guidance Note, drafted in consultation with the Institute\u2019s Legal Panel, reviews the recent Supreme Court conclusions in Dill v Secretary of State\u2026 [2020], answering \u2018When is a listed building not a listed building?\u2019 with:\u2018\u2026when it has &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=27225\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-27225","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-ihbc-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27225","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=27225"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27225\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":27226,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/27225\/revisions\/27226"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=27225"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=27225"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=27225"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}