{"id":23682,"date":"2019-08-23T16:29:18","date_gmt":"2019-08-23T15:29:18","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=23682"},"modified":"2019-08-23T16:29:18","modified_gmt":"2019-08-23T15:29:18","slug":"council-services-declining-due-to-5bn-funding-gap","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=23682","title":{"rendered":"Council services \u2018declining\u2019 due to \u00a35bn funding gap"},"content":{"rendered":"<h3><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-full wp-image-16876\" src=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/10\/ElizabethTower_parliamentUKimage.png\" alt=\"Elizabeth Tower - parliament UK image\" width=\"250\" height=\"125\" \/>Parliament reports that MPs have accused the Government of being \u2018derelict in its duty\u2019 to local authorities by failing to set out a funding settlement that would ease the pressure on frontline services.<\/h3>\n<h6><em>image:\u00a0Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the permission of Parliament<\/em><\/h6>\n<p><!--more--><\/p>\n<p>Parliament UK writes:<\/p>\n<p>Funding for local government has been cut significantly since 2010. At the same time as cutting funding, the Government restricted local authorities\u2019 ability to raise council tax to fill the gap. In recent years spending reductions have been less severe but local government spending is still much lower in real-terms than it was in 2010. In response to this financial pressure, local government has had little choice but to cut back on the non-statutory services it provides. For example, net expenditure on planning &amp; development and housing services has more than halved and net spending on highways &amp; transport and cultural &amp; leisure services is down more than 40%. Increasing demand for adult social care means that this trend is set to continue unless local government is provided with additional central government funding or the power to raise more revenues locally.<\/p>\n<p>Almost a decade of funding reductions has been accompanied by a move to business rate retention. This has made the local government finance system more complex, less transparent and has increased risks for some councils. Central government policy has also been inconsistent. NHS funding was protected but funding for adult social care was not. Councils were initially incentivised to freeze council tax but there is now an assumption that they will put it up above inflation. The lack of any council tax revaluation since the early 1990s also means that council tax is becoming disconnected from property values.<\/p>\n<p>Local government currently faces significant uncertainty. It needs to be able to plan for 2020\u201321 but there is a risk that the multi-year Spending Review may be delayed. A new funding formula and 75% business rate retention is also due in April 2020. There is also still no sign of the Green Paper on adult social care which was originally scheduled for 2017.<\/p>\n<p>Local government provides services for everyone but much of its resources are focused on some of the most vulnerable people in society. Children in care, adults with learning disabilities, the elderly in need of care and families at risk of homelessness are all reliant on services funded by local government.<\/p>\n<p>The current uncertainty for local government and the lack of funding for services must be addressed as a matter of urgency. Our main conclusions and recommendations are as follows:<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\"><em class=\"Emphasis\">Reduction in non-statutory services<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">Local government must balance the <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">books each year\u2014the severe funding reductions it has faced <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">has meant it has focused its spending on the acute <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">pressures and has had no choice but to cut non-<\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">statutory services.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">Forcing local government to reduce resources for these services may cause higher costs in the future or just move pressures to other parts of the public sector.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\"><em class=\"Emphasis\">Social <\/em><em class=\"Emphasis\">care<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">The rising demands of social care (both for adults <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">and children) are placing local government under increasing financial pressure. <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">These services help some of the most vulnerable in society <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">so must be properly funded<\/strong>.<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">Governments have been reviewing the funding of adult social care for some years but without conclusion. Without a solution local government will continue to be forced to cut back on the other services that it provides. Our recent report on adult social care highlighted the need for increased funding. We reiterate the recommendations we previously made\u2014there is a need for new revenue resources both at a local and national level. Local government must be given additional central government funding or powers to raise more revenue to deal with growing demand.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\"><em class=\"Emphasis\">Uncertainty<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">Providing a multi-<\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">year funding settlement has allowed councils to plan ahead. However, <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">the four-year settlement is now coming to an end, <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">with no plans for the next financial year. The resulting <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">uncertainty is causing problems for local government.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">Without clarity about funding in 2020 some local authorities will need to prepare for the worst, making decisions which may unnecessarily reduce spending and represent poor value for money in the longer term.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\"><em class=\"Emphasis\">Business rates<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">The business rate retention system is too complex <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">and lacks transparency.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">The tax is already coming under pressure from changes in the economy and the Treasury Committee is currently conducting an inquiry on the tax and its impact on business. Calls for reform are growing louder\u2014it is hard to see how it will endure over the long term.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">MHCLG needs to reform and make substantial changes to <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">the business rate retention system.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">The Government should consider making the system simpler by bringing back the Revenue Support Grant to redistribute to councils in need rather than trying to do this through an increasingly complex business rates retention system. The Government also needs to start considering alternatives to business rates as a revenue stream for local government, given the risks to this tax over the long-term.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\"><em class=\"Emphasis\">Council tax<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">Council tax is a regressive tax which has become disconnected <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">from property values.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">As part of a review of council tax, the Government should consider the case for creating new council tax bands at the top and bottom of the scale. We will return to this in our progress on devolution in England inquiry.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">A revaluation for council tax purposes is long overdue. The Government should hold a review into how a revaluation could be implemented without dramatic increases for individual households. Any revaluation should be revenue neutral at the national level. Revaluation also does not mean that significant changes in council tax must be put in place immediately, it could be phased in over time.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\"><em class=\"Emphasis\">Expectations for local government <\/em><em class=\"Emphasis\">and the need for additional funding<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">There is a lack <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">of clarity about what is expected of local government. This <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">ambiguity makes it difficult to clearly determine how much additional <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">funding the sector needs.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">The Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government, working with HM Treasury and other departments, should clearly set out what tasks are expected of local government and how much funding it requires. It should draw upon the work of academics and other experts, such as the National Audit Office.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">If HM Treasury wants local government to <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">continue providing the services it currently does it needs to <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">provide local government with a significant real-terms increase in <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">its spending power.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">To restore local government expenditure to the position it was, as a share of GDP, in 2000\u201301 would require an increase of around \u00a34 billion\u2014that is before taking into account the increased demands for services such as adult social care and children\u2019s services over the last twenty years. Analysis by the Local Government Association (LGA) and also independent analysis from PwC on behalf of the County Councils Network both assess that the annual funding gap for local government will be around \u00a35 billion in 2020\u201321. Looking further forward the LGA\u2019s analysis has estimated that by 2024\u201325 the funding gap will be around \u00a38 billion.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\"><em class=\"Emphasis\">Longer-term reform and devolution<\/em><\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">In the short-term local <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">government needs increased support from central government, but over the <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">medium to longer term other solutions are needed to ensure <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">that local government is financially sustainable.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">There is now significant urgency in delivering a solid future for the funding of local government in England. A decade of expenditure reductions has both service-delivery and constitutional implications.<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li class=\"UnorderedList1\"><strong class=\"Strong\">Devolution of more responsibilities <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">and revenue-raising powers to local government has the potential <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">to improve the financial sustainability of the sector and allow <\/strong><strong class=\"Strong\">better and more integrated services for the public.<\/strong><\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\">We intend to undertake a review of the progress of devolution in England which will examine a range of issues including access to new sources of revenue.<\/p>\n<p class=\"ParaContinued\"><a href=\"https:\/\/publications.parliament.uk\/pa\/cm201719\/cmselect\/cmcomloc\/2036\/203603.htm#_idTextAnchor000\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Read more&#8230;.<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Parliament reports that MPs have accused the Government of being \u2018derelict in its duty\u2019 to local authorities by failing to set out a funding settlement that would ease the pressure on frontline services. image:\u00a0Parliamentary copyright images are reproduced with the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=23682\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-23682","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23682","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=23682"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23682\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":23683,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/23682\/revisions\/23683"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=23682"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=23682"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=23682"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}