{"id":1832,"date":"2010-09-29T10:01:05","date_gmt":"2010-09-29T10:01:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=1832"},"modified":"2010-09-29T10:01:05","modified_gmt":"2010-09-29T10:01:05","slug":"ihbc-%e2%80%98uk-public-has-interest-in-hlf-eh-merger%e2%80%99","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1832","title":{"rendered":"IHBC: \u2018UK public has interest in HLF-EH merger\u2019"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n<\/strong>Widespread concern has emerged over the progress of discussions about merging English Heritage (EH) and the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) in the absence of wider UK consultation and public input.<\/p>\n

<\/span>Se\u00e1n O\u2019Reilly, Director of the Institute of Historic Building Conservation (IHBC), the UK\u2019s professional body for conservation specialists, said: “Re-organising some of the UK\u2019s heritage organisations, notably the Heritage Lottery Fund, to facilitate a merger with England\u2019s national heritage body, English Heritage, is not just an issue for England, it is a matter for all the communities that can benefit from heritage and lottery funding. \u00a0These communities, and their interests, span the entire United Kingdom, and any changes should fairly reflect input from that wider constituency.”<\/p>\n

Se\u00e1n O\u2019Reilly continued: “Any decision on merging the HLF and English Heritage without substantial consultation across the UK\u2018s heritage sector and communities could represent exactly the sort of public and local disenfranchisement that the coalition government seemed to want to overturn. \u00a0We all rely on a tourist industry that is underpinned by our built heritage and its funding. \u00a0Whether outside or inside England, people should be at the heart of these discussions, shaping their outcomes in line with the new government\u2019s people-led agenda.”<\/p>\n

In Wales, for example, concern has been voiced at the impact on Welsh heritage of leaked UK government plans to axe 180 quangos. \u00a0The BBC reports as follows:<\/p>\n

<\/span><\/p>\n

\u2018The possible merger of the Heritage Lottery Fund with English Heritage could mean grants applicants from Wales having to approach the English body.<\/p>\n

Former Heritage Minister Rhodri Glyn Thomas is worried about Welsh heritage body Cadw, which is barred from distributing lottery funds.<\/p>\n

The assembly government said there were ‘significant implications’ for Wales.<\/p>\n

BBC Radio Wales’ Sunday Supplement programme disclosed that the assembly government had written to Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt expressing its concern.<\/p>\n

Alun Ffred Jones, who succeeded Mr Thomas as heritage minister, will meet Mr Hunt next week to discuss the issue.<\/p>\n

The leaked proposals suggested thousands of jobs could be at risk, with the abolition of bodies such as the Health Protection Agency, UK Film Council, and Audit Commission suggested.<\/p>\n

Mr Thomas, Plaid Cymru AM for Carmarthen East and Dinefwr, said a merger of the Heritage Lottery Fund and English Heritage seemed ‘a very odd suggestion’.<\/p>\n

He said Cadw could not by law distribute lottery funding and had a “very different aim to English Heritage”.<\/p>\n

Mr Thomas said it was important to safeguard the role of Cadw, a national body within Wales.<\/p>\n

“It was seen at one time as a body which was there to preserve historical buildings and monuments in Wales and seemed to want to keep people away from them in order to preserve them, but that’s changed over the last decade,” he said.<\/p>\n

“They’ve seen themselves now as facilitating access to these buildings and making that a far more rewarding experience. So I think it would be a tragedy if the role of Cadw was changed in any way by the UK government.”<\/p>\n

Mr Thomas said one option could be a separate Heritage Lottery Fund for Wales.<\/p>\n

“The problem we may have is that these mergers are there for a purpose of course – to save money for the UK government,” he said. “And we have to be very wary that that will have a knock-on effect with the money that will come through central funding to the assembly and we need to preserve the ability of Cadw to work as it is at the moment.”<\/p>\n

An assembly government spokesperson said it was not possible to comment in detail at this stage as it had not seen the UK government’s full plans. “However, there would be significant implications for Wales and the other devolved nations if the English Heritage were to be merged with the UK-wide Heritage Lottery Fund and National Heritage Memorial Fund,” said the spokesperson. “Our priority would be to safeguard the funding available to heritage projects in Wales. We would be concerned that Wales should not be disadvantaged in its ability to access heritage lottery funds in the future.”<\/p>\n

The UK Cabinet Office has declined to comment on the leaks, but said the government had “made it clear that it is committed to radically increasing accountability and improving efficiency”.
\n<\/span><\/p><\/blockquote>\n


\nIn response to the issues raised in the article Richard Dean, IHBC Wales Branch Chair, said: “<\/span>If HLF and EH were to merge in England, where would that leave Wales’ historic environment when HLF has become the major source of funding for heritage in Wales?”
\n<\/span>
\nFor Wales see BBC News Wales: LINK<\/a>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

For \u2018Cuts Watch\u2019 see\u00a0 BBC News:\u00a0 LINK<\/a>
\n<\/span><\/span><\/span><\/p>\n

Heritage Lottery Fund Article: LINK<\/a>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n

Daily Telegraph Article: <\/a>LINK<\/a>
\n<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Widespread concern has emerged over the progress of discussions about merging English Heritage (EH) and the Heritage Lottery Fund (HLF) in the absence of wider UK consultation and public input. Se\u00e1n O\u2019Reilly, Director of the Institute of Historic Building Conservation … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1832","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1832","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1832"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1832\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1833,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1832\/revisions\/1833"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1832"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1832"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1832"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}