{"id":1695,"date":"2010-08-25T16:31:20","date_gmt":"2010-08-25T16:31:20","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=1695"},"modified":"2010-08-25T16:31:20","modified_gmt":"2010-08-25T16:31:20","slug":"cigarette-bin-row-in-conservation-area","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1695","title":{"rendered":"Cigarette bin row in conservation area"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><span style=\"font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;\"><strong>Cigarette bin row in conservation area<br \/>\n<\/strong><span style=\"text-decoration: underline;\">Westminster City Council has decided to go to court over a number  of branded cigarette bins located in a conservation area which it has  argued require planning permission.<br \/>\n<\/span><br \/>\nAt issue are 21 cigarette bins, all branded with the name of Europe\u2019s  biggest cab company, Addison Lee. It has supplied some 16,000 free bins  for smokers outside pubs and restaurants in the capital.<\/p>\n<p>The planning authority has claimed that the bins breach planning  regulations relating to advertising in designated locations like  conservation areas. The bins in question are at seven different  locations in the Marylebone Conservation Area.<\/p>\n<p>Rosemarie MacQueen, the council\u2019s strategic director for the built  environment, said: \u201cWe have strict rules on advertising to prevent  Westminster being overrun with a plethora of adverts and these apply to  everyone \u2013 including Addison Lee.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>She added: \u00a0\u201cWe\u2019re not against any particular type of advertising, and  the merits of the advertising or the purpose of the bins is irrelevant.  We will always be fair and flexible as far as possible, but we cannot  have any one commercial organisation being the sole arbiter in deciding  what, how and where it can advertise.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>Addison Lee chairman John Griffin said in a statement: &#8220;Adbins has been  operating since 2007 and now provides around 16,000 cigarette bins to  thousands of businesses across London. Since the smoking ban came into  effect in 2007, business owners have been liable to be charged fines  should they not provide receptacles for litter \u00a0&#8211; specifically including  cigarette butts \u2013 of up to \u00a32,500.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cSo now, more than three years after we started providing these bins at  zero cost to businesses in London, somebody at Westminster Council with  too much time on their hands has decided to persecute us for helping to  reduce the 2,700 tonnes of cigarette butts dropped in London streets  each year. Westminster argues that we need planning permission for the  bins, but whenever we put the bin up, we get the permission of the  restaurant. If the restaurant needs planning permission, that is a  matter for them.<\/p>\n<p>\u201cWestminster Council themselves spend at least \u00a332m a year on waste  collection, street cleaning and issuing press releases announcing a  crackdown on smoking litter. Now they are wasting taxpayers\u2019 money to  take us to court in this perverse action when they should be thanking us  for doing our bit to keep the streets tidy at no cost to anyone but  ourselves.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>The test-case is scheduled to be heard by City of Westminster Magistrates on 29 September.<\/span><\/p>\n<p><span style=\"font-family: Verdana,Helvetica,Arial;\">Search Planning Portal: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/professionals\/news\/archive\/2010\/august2010\/2010_08_week_3\/190810_2\" target=\"_blank\">LINK<\/a><a rel=\"nofollow\" href=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/professionals\/news\/archive\/2010\/august2010\/2010_08_week_3\/190810_2\" target=\"_blank\"><br \/>\n<\/a><\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cigarette bin row in conservation area Westminster City Council has decided to go to court over a number of branded cigarette bins located in a conservation area which it has argued require planning permission. At issue are 21 cigarette bins, &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1695\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1695","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1695","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1695"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1695\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1696,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1695\/revisions\/1696"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1695"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1695"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1695"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}