{"id":1508,"date":"2010-07-12T17:15:40","date_gmt":"2010-07-12T17:15:40","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=1508"},"modified":"2010-07-12T17:15:40","modified_gmt":"2010-07-12T17:15:40","slug":"carbon-compliance-%e2%80%98sap%e2%80%99-tool-inadequate","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1508","title":{"rendered":"Carbon compliance \u2018SAP\u2019 tool: &#8216;inadequate&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Urgent action demanded to  improve    SAP for calculating energy use of new homes<\/p>\n<p>The government\u2019s tool for calculating the energy performance of new  dwellings    cannot adequately meet the challenges of delivering low-energy and  zero-carbon    houses, concludes a new report.<\/p>\n<p>A six-month study undertaken by the Zero Carbon Hub, due to be  published next    week, concludes that the Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP) now used  to    calculate the energy performance of new dwellings and demonstrate  compliance    with Building Regulations is not adequate in its current form.<\/p>\n<p>Compliance tools are used to assess a design to see if it meets the  energy    criteria set out in regulations and often steers designers and the  products    and systems they specify. However, should the compliance regime result  in a    poor reflection of reality then there is a risk that carbon emissions  and    energy use will be higher than expected.<\/p>\n<p>The report suggests that urgent action is required to ensure that a  compliance    tool fit for purpose is developed to meet the government\u2019s target for  all new    homes to be zero carbon by 2016.<\/p>\n<p>It proposes that the development of a tool could be financed by  government, or    through the private sector with government maintaining ownership of  the    policy.<\/p>\n<p>David McEwan (Glasgow) comments on 9 Jul 10 4:44 pm:<\/p>\n<p>&#8216;Although it\u2019s unclear as to whether this report refers to SAP 2005 or  the    Part L 2010 version (confusingly termed SAP 2009), it raises an  important    question; why is the Government continuing to spend money expanding  the    capabilities of SAP, when other alternative tools are already  available in the    form of SBEM and DSM?<\/p>\n<p>These existing non-domestic compliance methods can equally apply to  domestic    properties and offer tools which are flexible enough to accommodate  different    levels of building complexity \u2013 the kind of complexity required in new  housing    to achieve zero-carbon, with all the associated passive design  strategies,    clean-technology and renewable energy sources.<\/p>\n<p>The Part L 2010 version of SAP has already moved to a monthly  calculation    method, the same as SBEM. Surely opening up the choice of tools  available for    domestic dwelling compliance allows more flexibility \u2013 enabling  designers to    pick the tool sufficiently complex for the building in question.<\/p>\n<p>At this time when the Government is asking for ideas on how to save  money,    surely making use of existing tools that Energy Assessors are already  familiar    with is the most cost effective way forward without the need for more    government investment?&#8217;<\/p>\n<p>Building Newsletter:   <a href=\"http:\/\/www.building.co.uk\/5002377.article?origin=bldgdailynewsletter\"> LINK<\/a><br \/>\nZero Carbon Hub: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.zerocarbonhub.org\/index.aspx\">LINK<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Urgent action demanded to improve SAP for calculating energy use of new homes The government\u2019s tool for calculating the energy performance of new dwellings cannot adequately meet the challenges of delivering low-energy and zero-carbon houses, concludes a new report. A &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1508\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1508","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1508"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1509,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1508\/revisions\/1509"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1508"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1508"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1508"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}