{"id":1506,"date":"2010-07-12T17:14:58","date_gmt":"2010-07-12T17:14:58","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=1506"},"modified":"2010-07-12T17:14:58","modified_gmt":"2010-07-12T17:14:58","slug":"penfold-review-out","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1506","title":{"rendered":"Penfold review out"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Penfold Review, set up  to    identify whether non-planning consents delay or discourage investment,  has    published its final report.<\/p>\n<p>This report, following the interim report in March, sets out  recommendations    to simplifying the planning and consents environment and includes  proposals    that could free up resources, save time and money, and deliver real  benefits    not only to developers and investors, but also to consenting bodies in     England. Local communities in could also benefit from greater  transparency and    clarity about how decisions are made.<\/p>\n<p>The review focused on &#8216;non-planning consents&#8217;, such as environmental  permits,    highways orders, and heritage consents that are needed alongside or  after    planning permission. It found a complex and fragmented landscape that  poses    real problems for some businesses to navigate effectively.<\/p>\n<p>The Review recommends:<br \/>\n* simplifying the non-planning consents landscape by removing some     individual consents and rationalising other groups of related consents<br \/>\n* giving developers easy access to clear, accurate and up-to-date    information<br \/>\n* delivering greater certainty for developers and removing  duplication by    improving the way planning and non-planning consents operate together<br \/>\n* improve the co-ordination and governance around decisions  involving    multiple decision makers<br \/>\n* strengthening the service culture of decision-making bodies by,  for    example, setting timetables for the determination of non-planning  consents<br \/>\n* creating a clear system for oversight of the planning and  non-planning    landscape<\/p>\n<p>The Government will consider the recommendations from the Penfold  Review in    detail and will publish a formal response in the autumn.<\/p>\n<p>Download the report   <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ihbc.org.uk\/news\/docs\/10-1027-penfold-review-final-report120710.pdf\">HERE<\/a><br \/>\nBIS Penfold Review: <a href=\"http:\/\/www.bis.gov.uk\/penfold\">LINK<\/a><br \/>\nSearch The Planning Portal:   <a href=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/professionals\/news\/archive\/2010\/july2010\/2010_07_week_1\/010710_6\"> LINK<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Penfold Review, set up to identify whether non-planning consents delay or discourage investment, has published its final report. This report, following the interim report in March, sets out recommendations to simplifying the planning and consents environment and includes proposals &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1506\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1506","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1506","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1506"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1506\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1507,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1506\/revisions\/1507"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1506"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1506"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1506"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}