{"id":1187,"date":"2010-03-23T14:12:57","date_gmt":"2010-03-23T14:12:57","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=1187"},"modified":"2010-03-24T14:13:15","modified_gmt":"2010-03-24T14:13:15","slug":"high-court-quashes-prudhoe-permission","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1187","title":{"rendered":"High Court quashes Prudhoe permission"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A High Court judge has  quashed the    planning permission for a redevelopment scheme as it determined that  the    application should have been subject to Environmental Impact  Assessment (EIA)    legislation.<\/p>\n<p>Proposed by the Duke of Northumberland for the town centre of Prudhoe  and    approved by the former Tynedale District Council, now part of the  unitary    Northumberland County Council, the \u00a330m project included a new  Sainsbury\u2019s    store, a multi-storey car park and more than 150 new homes. However,  the    proposals were the subject of a legal challenge by the Co-operative  Group    which has a store in the North East town. It argued that an  environmental    impact assessment (EIA) of the scheme should have been undertaken.<\/p>\n<p>Following the judgment, Richard Robson, the county council\u2019s executive     director of place, said: \u201cThe council is disappointed with the ruling.     However, we will continue with our discussions on how to improve  Prudhoe town    centre, for the benefit of residents, businesses and visitors.\u201d  \u00a0Robson was    chief executive of the former district council when it approved the  mixed-use    development.<\/p>\n<p>The Co-operative Group Limited applied for a judicial review of the  decision    of the former Tynedale District Council to grant full planning  permission for    a mixed retail office and residential development at land off Front  Street and    Station Road, Prudhoe, and outline permission for residential  development and    the relocation of the United Services Club.<\/p>\n<p>The Co-op claimed that the scheme was one to which the Town and  Country    Planning (Environmental Impact Assessment) (England and Wales)  Regulations    1999 applied and that an EIA ought to have been required before the    application for planning permission was considered. The basis of the  Co-op\u2019s    claim for judicial review was that Tynedale Council had erred in law  when it    determined that the regulations did not apply and granted planning  permission    for the development in February 2009.<\/p>\n<p>The judicial review was heard at the Administrative Court in  Manchester last    month and the judgment was delivered earlier this month.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/professionals\/news\/archive\/2010\/march2010\/2010_03_week_3\/180310_5\"> <strong>Link to Planning Portal news item<\/strong><\/a><br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/www.northumberland.gov.uk\/default.aspx?page=6270&amp;article=550\"> <strong>Link to Northumberland CC article<\/strong><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A High Court judge has quashed the planning permission for a redevelopment scheme as it determined that the application should have been subject to Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) legislation. Proposed by the Duke of Northumberland for the town centre of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1187\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1187"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1188,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1187\/revisions\/1188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}