{"id":1181,"date":"2010-03-19T14:10:27","date_gmt":"2010-03-19T14:10:27","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=1181"},"modified":"2010-03-24T14:10:43","modified_gmt":"2010-03-24T14:10:43","slug":"us-study-heritage-friendly-tax-1-8m-jobs-best-value","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1181","title":{"rendered":"US study: heritage friendly tax = 1.8m jobs (best value)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A comprehensive new report conducted by  Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, analyzes the economic  impact of the federal Historic Tax Credit since its inception in 1976,  \u2018clearly shows that historic preservation is a powerful tool for  economic revitalization and job creation\u2019 and concludes that the  Historic Tax Credit is a highly efficient job creator\u2014accounting for the  creation of 1.8 million new jobs over the life of the program.<\/p>\n<div>\n<div>\nThe  report found that Historic Tax Credits generated those jobs more  efficiently than other stimulus options and, in fact, the study  concludes that the economic activity leveraged by Historic Tax Credit  returns more tax revenue to the U.S. Treasury than the cost of  implementing the program. The report, the first-ever to comprehensively  examine the economic impact of the federal Historic Tax Credit, also  underscores the need for additional legislation to strengthen the  federal credits, making them more widely available for smaller, rural  projects and also encouraging their use for green and sustainable rehab  projects.<\/p>\n<p>The report was conducted by researchers at the Edward  J. Bloustein School of Planning and Public Policy, Rutgers, the State  University of New Jersey, and commissioned by the Historic Tax Credit  Coalition, a public policy advocacy organization. The report was  produced by the Rutgers University Center for Urban Policy Research  under the guidance of Dr. David Listokin, a national expert in the  economics of historic preservation.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This report reflects a  15-year effort on the part of Rutgers, working with the National Park  Service and numerous state historic preservation offices, to quantify  the specific economic impacts of historic preservation,&#8221; said Dr.  Listokin. &#8220;Using detailed models, we looked at both the direct,  immediate economic impact\u2014at both the state and national level\u2014of  historic preservation projects, as well as the secondary effects those  projects have on the national and state economies. Our report, which  builds on the regional economic analysis conducted by Dr. Michael Lahr, a  professor at Rutgers University, clearly shows that historic  preservation is a powerful tool for economic revitalization and job  creation.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Major findings of the report include:<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7 \u00a0The  Historic Tax Credit is an efficient job creator\u2014 rehabilitation  investments have generated about 1.8 million new jobs since 1976 and  58.8 thousand in 2008 alone. The Rutgers study shows that historic rehab  projects require more highly skilled workers, generate better-paying  jobs and return more economic benefits to local communities than other  stimulus strategies such as highway construction.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7 \u00a0The  cumulative impacts to the national economy are substantial, including  $198 billion in total output, $98 billion towards Gross Domestic Product  (GDP), $72 billion in wages and salaries, and $29 billion in federal,  state and local taxes.<\/p>\n<p>\u00b7 \u00a0The federal Historic Tax Credit is a  strategic investment for the nation, evidenced by the fact that the  total federal cost of the HTC, $16.6 billion in 2008 inflation-adjusted  dollars, is more than offset by the $21 billion in additional federal  taxes paid as a result of HTC project activity to date. In addition, the  $16.6 billion investment has leveraged a five times greater amount of  historic rehabilitation costs\u2014a total of $85 billion.<\/p>\n<p>While  underscoring the success of the Historic Tax Credit program, the report  suggests several improvements to modernize the program and ensure its  continued efficacy\u2014all of which are included in the Community  Restoration and Revitalization Act now before Congress. The legislation,  introduced in the House by Reps. Allyson Schwartz (D-PA) and Patrick  Tiberi (R-OH) and in the Senate by Sens. Olympia Snowe (R-ME) and  Blanche Lincoln (D-AR), seeks to amend the Historic Tax Credit to  facilitate smaller, Main Street-scale investments, providing incentives  for the kind of sustainable rehab projects that make historic buildings  more energy-efficient, and expanding the number of properties that would  be eligible to earn these federal tax credits.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This report  makes clear that historic preservation is not just about holding on to  our past, it&#8217;s also about building a better future by creating jobs,  spurring revitalization, developing sustainable communities, and  improving the economic health of the nation,&#8221; said Richard Moe,  president of the National Trust for Historic Preservation. &#8220;By  encouraging the restoration and rehabilitation of older and historic  buildings, historic tax credits are one of the best investments  government can make\u2014a key consideration in lean budget years. This  report should invigorate Congress to pass the Community Restoration and  Revitalization Act and strengthen the federal historic tax credit  program.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;Both Republicans and Democrats agree that more needs  to be done to create jobs, but sometimes disagree on the tactics,&#8221; said  Congressman Russ Carnahan (D-MO). &#8220;The good news is that we agree that  historic preservation creates jobs and does so with a net gain in  revenue. My home state of Missouri serves as an example where more than  40,000 jobs have been created through historic preservation since 1998.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>Carnahan  has introduced HR 3670, the Historic Homeowners Revitalization Act  using the successful Missouri model on the national level and has 37  cosponsors from both parties. Representatives Carnahan (D-MO) and Turner  (R-OH) co-chair the bipartisan Congressional Historic Preservation  Caucus that serves as a forum for Members to discuss ways to protect and  revitalize America&#8217;s historic places and structures.<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;During my  tenure as Mayor of Dayton and now as a Member of Congress, I have seen  first-hand how the historic tax credit helps to promote economic  development while at the same time also helps to revitalize our historic  structures to preserve our nation&#8217;s proud history,&#8221; said Rep. Michael  Turner (R-OH). &#8220;I thank Professor Listokin and his team for this report  that confirms that the historic tax credit creates jobs, rehabilitates  downtown areas, restores historic towns, and supports investment in our  neighborhoods. \u00a0It&#8217;s important to preserve our cultural legacy for  future generations to come.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;A strengthened Historic Tax Credit  program, not only protects our past, but secures our future by creating  more jobs and encouraging revitalization,&#8221; said Representative Patrick  Tiberi (R-OH). &#8220;As this report shows, enactment of the Community  Restoration and Revitalization Act would mean more jobs on Main Street,  preserved historic buildings and property, and stronger communities.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>&#8220;This  report shows that the economic impacts of historic rehab are aligned  with many of our nation&#8217;s most important needs during these tough  times,&#8221; said John Leith-Tetrault, President of the Historic Tax Credit  Coalition. &#8220;Rutgers&#8217; research makes the case for enhancements to the  federal historic tax credit as an important part of any Congressional  stimulus package. Given how difficult it is for our industry to finance  rehabilitation projects right now, the timing for these amendments  couldn&#8217;t be better.&#8221;<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"http:\/\/www.ihbc.org.uk\/news\/docs\/RutgersReportMar2010.pdf\" href=\"http:\/\/www.ihbc.org.uk\/news\/docs\/RutgersReportMar2010.pdf\">Download  report HERE<\/a><\/p>\n<p><a title=\"http:\/\/www.preservationnation.org\/about-us\/press-center\/press-releases\/2010\/major-new-report-illustrates.html\" href=\"http:\/\/www.preservationnation.org\/about-us\/press-center\/press-releases\/2010\/major-new-report-illustrates.html\">Link  to National Trust for Historic Preservation <\/a><br \/>\n<a title=\"http:\/\/www.internationaltrusts.org\/?p=2539\" href=\"http:\/\/www.internationaltrusts.org\/?p=2539\">Link to INTO article<\/a><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>A comprehensive new report conducted by Rutgers, the State University of New Jersey, analyzes the economic impact of the federal Historic Tax Credit since its inception in 1976, \u2018clearly shows that historic preservation is a powerful tool for economic revitalization &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1181\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1181","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1181"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1182,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1181\/revisions\/1182"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1181"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1181"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1181"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}