{"id":1177,"date":"2010-03-19T14:09:32","date_gmt":"2010-03-19T14:09:32","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/ihbconline.co.uk\/newsachive\/?p=1177"},"modified":"2010-03-24T14:09:48","modified_gmt":"2010-03-24T14:09:48","slug":"clg-pd-changes-confirmed","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1177","title":{"rendered":"CLG: PD changes confirmed"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Housing and planning minister John  Healey has confirmed further reforms to the planning system in England,  consulted on last year and recommended in the Killian Pretty Review,  which will remove an estimated 10,000 full planning applications from  the system.<\/p>\n<p>This move follows the Improving Permitted Development  (IPD) consultation which took forward recommendations from the Killian  Pretty Review for removing the requirement to apply for planning  permission for certain forms of non-domestic development.<\/p>\n<p>Shops  will now be able to extend their floor space by up to a maximum of 50  square metres without the need to apply for planning permission, and  schools, hospitals and universities will be able to more easily build  new facilities. These new rights will be subject to certain constraints  which are designed to minimise impacts on neighbouring properties and  the wider environment.<\/p>\n<p>The measures just introduced focus on  changes to permitted development, which remove the need to make a  planning application. At a later date, replacement shop fronts and  installing cash points will also be subject to a simpler, cheaper and  quicker planning process, called prior approval.<\/p>\n<p>These changes  form a series of updates in response to the Killian Pretty Review which,  when fully introduced, will save up to \u00a3180m a year for developers,  ministers have estimated.<\/p>\n<p>The changes to permitted development  are set out in The Town and Country Planning (General Permitted  Development) (Amendment) (England) Order 2010.<\/p>\n<p>Steve Quartermain,  the chief planner at Communities and Local Government, has sent a  letter to all chief planning officers setting out these latest changes  and other planning regulation moves. \u00a0He explained that these measures,  contained in a number of statutory instruments, \u2018set out new  arrangements in relation to the publicity of planning applications,  information requirements for planning applications, and permitted  development. The statutory instruments also take forward a number of  other changes to the planning application and appeal process on which we  have previously consulted, but are not directly in response to Killian  Pretty\u2019.<\/p>\n<p><a title=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/professionals\/news\/archive\/2010\/march2010\/2010_03_\" href=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/professionals\/news\/archive\/2010\/march2010\/2010_03_\">Link  to Planning Portal article<\/a><br \/>\n<a title=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/professionals\/policy\/reform\/parhome\/\" href=\"http:\/\/www.planningportal.gov.uk\/england\/professionals\/policy\/reform\/parhome\/\">Link  to Review<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Housing and planning minister John Healey has confirmed further reforms to the planning system in England, consulted on last year and recommended in the Killian Pretty Review, which will remove an estimated 10,000 full planning applications from the system. This &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/?p=1177\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[5],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-1177","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-sector-newsblog"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1177","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=1177"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1177\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":1178,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/1177\/revisions\/1178"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=1177"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=1177"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/newsblogs.ihbc.org.uk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=1177"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}